In July I read a wide variety of books. Let’s get straight to the reviews!
- Get in Trouble by Kelly Link is a collection of strange and beguiling stories. The stories feature pyramids and ghosts and pocket universes and automaton boyfriends and superheroes and my brother. Yes, I was shocked to find my older brother named in the third story, an epistolary tale about secret identities. So maybe it wasn’t my brother after all, but someone pretending to be him. Either way, it was unnerving to find his name there. It’s not like I have a common last name like Smith or Jones. The first story “The Summer People” was one of my favorites (and can be read here for free online). In it, a girl in the country takes care of a mysterious and magical cottage behind her house that is home to playful strangers (sprites? elves?) that no one can quite see. When she comes down sick, she ropes a friend from school into helping her. It hit the right tone between reality and fantasy that got under my skin so I didn’t know what to believe. Another favorite came near the end called “Two Houses,” in which a group of astronauts tell ghost stories to each other while they travel to distant stars. The central story within the story features an art installation of two houses, one a house transported piece by piece from the southwest United States to the English countryside (in a twist from the castles or bridges disassembled and transported to America) and the other an exact replica of the same house. Terrible murders had taken place in the first house and there were bloodstains on the carpet, and these stains were copied in the second house. It was impossible to tell which house was the original and which the copy, which was haunted and which had imagined ghosts. It was a great story. I’d recommend this book to fans of Neil Gaiman and anyone who likes stories that are a little strange and exciting. It was another book I found from the Girl Canon list.
- The Opposite of Spoiled: Raising Kids Who Are Grounded, Generous, and Smart About Money by Ron Lieber is a useful book for parents. Lieber’s main argument is that kids need to learn about money from parents before they are on their own and making decisions about student loans and everything else, and he has lots of ideas on how to go about it. How we handle our money is a reflection of our values, so talking to kids about money is a way to teach them about patience, generosity, and perspective. One idea I found especially interesting was that he advocates separating allowances from doing chores. He thinks kids should get an allowance even at an early age (by 1st grade, which seems pretty early to me), and that it is a way for kids to practice with money. The cover of the book shows three jars with the signs “Give,” “Save,” and “Spend,” which is his idea for what kids should do with the allowance. This allocation system sounded familiar from my upbringing that involved a set of envelopes. Lieber likes clear containers so that a child can see the money accumulate as they save money to give away or to spend on a larger item. The act of waiting is hard for a kid, but a crucial lesson to learn. He argues that kids should still do chores because they are part of the household and everyone is responsible for its maintenance. Parents don’t get any money for doing the dishes or cooking or vacuuming, so neither should the children. He says that if kids have trouble doing their contribution of chores, there are plenty of privileges that can be taken away to help motivate them instead of withholding an allowance. Another area that he advocates parents involve children is in charitable giving. He provides lots of ways that kids can be involved in the conversation, including their own giving. The main drawback to the book is that it is clearly written for people at the median of wage-earners and above. Many examples are from affluent families, though often the principles could be applied across the spectrum. I suppose that is the audience for a book about teaching kids about money. I found out about the book from an article in Slate. It was worth checking out of the library.
- God and the Gay Christian: The Biblical Case for Same-Sex Marriage by Matthew Vines is an important argument for Christians and churches to consider. My own denomination, the Episcopal Church, recently decided to allow same sex marriages at their General Convention, a move that came soon after the Supreme Court decision that declared all states must recognize same sex marriages. But many other denominations and churches will continue to wrestle with what to do about LGBT individuals and same sex marriage. Vines presents a well-organized and detailed argument that the church should affirm LGBT individuals and marriage between same sex partners that is monogamous and committed. And it fulfills the promise of its subtitle: it is a biblical argument. He takes the Bible seriously, stating early on that he believes “all of Scripture is inspired by God and authoritative for [his] life” (2). One thing I especially appreciated about the book is that he never presents strawmen to knock down. The book is thoroughly researched, and he’s read the books of non-affirming scholars and teachers (especially Robert A. J. Gagnon, among others) and presents their arguments fairly when disagreeing with them. Here’s a quick summary of his arguments. He first presents a utilitarian question: does the church’s current stance produce the good fruit that Jesus says a good tree will? Then he provides a history lesson showing that sexual orientation is a modern concept that the biblical writers were not addressing when they wrote about same sex behavior. Next comes a look at celibacy in scripture and history where he notes that it has always been a voluntary decision, not forced on an individual. A large portion of the book is devoted to understanding the six passages in the Bible that concern same sex behavior, focusing especially on the historical context. After that, he examines marriage and shows that its essential feature is the covenantal bond, not the sex or gender of the partners. Lastly, he writes about how everyone, including LGBT individuals, are created in the image of God, without dismissing the doctrines of sin and grace. All in all, it is an impressive and comprehensive argument on same sex marriage. I would highly recommend this book to all Christians, especially evangelicals. Even if they read it and still disagree with his conclusions, they will still come away knowing that those who are affirming of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Christians and same sex marriage have good reasons for their beliefs. [see comment below for my discussion of the “refutation” of Vines’s book]
- Carver: A Life in Poems by Marilyn Nelson is exactly what its title would make a reader expect: a biography of George Washington Carver in poetry. And it works. While I would be unlikely to pick up a prose biography of Carver (not because he led an uninteresting life, quite the opposite, but because there are too many biographies of interesting people that I will never pick up), I decided to read this volume because I knew and liked Nelson’s poetry (her much anthologized sonnet “How I Discovered Poetry” is a particular standout). By telling his life story in brief moments told from many different points of view allows the reader to enter the scenes and the thoughts of Carver and the people in his life. Though it is marketed for children (my used copy is a Scholastic school market version), there is nothing about it that is only for children. Carver was a generous man, giving away formulas and secrets that he could have kept to get rich, such as a blue pigment that was deeper and richer than any known for thousands of years (“Egyptian Blue”). He received “[o]ffers to pay / for answers the Creator gives / him for nothing” (“The Year of the Sky-Smear”). He is, of course, famous for his work with peanuts and crop rotation, but he was interested in most everything in the natural world. The poem “Ruellia Noctiflora,” spoken from the point of view of woman who meets Carver unexpectedly in the woods, shows how he could see the world differently than others: “Where he pointed was only a white flower / until I saw him seeing it.” In many ways, I thought it read better than a traditional biography would have. It reminds me of Ted Kooser’s The Blizzard Voices, which I enjoyed more than the prose history of David Laskin’s The Children’s Blizzard (both tell the stories of those who lived and died during the horrific blizzard of 1888 on the Great Plains). I would recommend Nelson’s volume of poems for anyone who is remotely interested in Carver and anyone who likes good poetry.
- My Cousin Rachel by Daphne du Maurier is a good, but not great, gothic romance from the same author as Rebecca. It shares a similar setting as Rebecca, a large estate in Cornwall, the southwestern peninsula of England, and it also shares a similarly mysterious woman at the center of the story. In Rebecca the mysterious woman was the absent title character: she haunts the novel from beginning to end. In My Cousin Rachel, the title character Rachel is very much present throughout the novel, but her thoughts and motivations are unknown to the narrator, her cousin Philip Ashley. Rachel is Philip’s cousin by marriage. Philip is a young man who lives with his older cousin Ambrose Ashley as a ward since his parents died at an early age. Ambrose, himself a bachelor at the beginning of the novel, raised him as his own son. But soon after those first pages of the novel, he travels to Italy for his health during the winter and meets and marries Rachel. Not long afterwards, Ambrose dies under mysterious circumstances. It is believed that he had a brain tumor, but Ambrose had sent cryptic letters back to Philip that point to Rachel somehow being the cause of his illness. Philip begins by hating Rachel because she has taken away Ambrose, but when he finally meets her (still quite early in the novel), he finds her very difficult to hate. As readers, we worry for our naïve narrator Philip until we eventually pity him. I was worried that I might end up disliking the book, but du Maurier wraps it all up satisfactorily by the end. She uses the technique of foreshadowing rather explicitly in the first chapter, but it wasn’t clear to me until the end what she had done, so I had to reread the first chapter afterwards to see how she had done it. It was rather like a Möbius strip, circularly leading back from the end to the beginning. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoyed Rebecca or gothic romance in general, with tempered expectations.